Advanced Structural Designs

  

ACN 097 789 87   92 Vasey Cres CAMPBELL ACT 2612

Telephone  61612171         Facsimile 61612170

Email   mal@structuraldesigns.com.au

 

 

 
                                                                                                           

                                                             

 

What are the pros and cons of stressing an in-situ concrete slab?

 

The main advantages of prestressing are

 

*   Less overall building weight resulting in reduced material cost and footing size.

*   Shallower beam sizes can lead to reduced floor to floor heights and reduction in façade costs

*   Greater spans are possible, allowing greater fit out flexibility.

*   Tighter and more reliable deflection control is both possible and economical.

*   The relatively waterproof nature of prestressed concrete provides a superior barrier against water penetration over basement car parks and beneath exposed slab edges.

*   The relatively crack free nature of a prestressed structure provides increased protection to the reinforcement and superior durability performance.

*   Stripping times are generally less, enabling economies in the use of formwork.

*   Large unplanned penetrations can sometimes be accommodated in between the stressing tendons without the need for trimming beams.

*   The strands are generally simple to locate prior to coring.

*   The deck prior to concreting is relatively uncluttered and safe to work on.

 

The main disadvantages are

 

*   The recess for the stressing live end at the ends of slabs and beams needs to be carefully patched, generally in a two stage procedure if they are to be texture painted.

*   When an off form edge finish is required or the structure edge is not accessible pans are placed in the slabs which also require patching.

*   Unauthorised coring of the slab can seriously weaken the structure when tendons are hit.

*   Overall building horizontal shortening is increased. If this shortening is not planned for, it can lead to increased bending in columns and stress on façade elements.

*   For very small projects (say less than 350m^2) stressing may be more expensive.

*   For very short runs of cable (say less than 7m) stressing becomes inefficient due to draw-in losses.

 

In the last 5 years in Canberra working on moderate to large projects I have recommended stressing in about 95% of cases where the floors were cast in situ. 

If you have a particular project in mind in Canberra ACT and need a structural engineer’s opinion on the most economical framing option, call Mal Wilson from Advanced Structural Designs (02) 61612171.

home     FAQ's